Rachel is ranked as a leading junior (Tier 2) for clinical negligence in Legal 500 2023. She has a thriving practice and has developed a particular focus on delayed diagnosis and treatment of cancers (primary and metastatic disease), colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery, obstetrics/gynaecology and ophthalmology. She also has a special interest in breast cancer cases.
Recent instructions include cases (for claimants and defendants) in the fields of:
Oncology:
- Mistaken diagnosis of breast cancer leading to unnecessary surgery and lymph node excision.
- Delayed diagnosis and negligent treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer.
- Delayed diagnosis and negligent post-surgical adjuvant treatment of oestrogen-positive,HER-2 negative breast cancer.
- Alleged delayed diagnosis of osteosarcoma resulting in limb amputation.
- Negligent radiological analysis and reporting of bone cancers and metastatic disease.
- Delayed diagnosis and negligent treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer.
- Delayed diagnosis and negligent post-surgical adjuvant treatment of oestrogen-positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer.
Ophthalmology:
- Negligent management of keratoconus in a young woman with permanent damage to vision and otherwise avoidable transplant surgery.
- A consent dispute involving poor corneal transplant outcomes in a patient with Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy.
General/GI surgery
- Duodenal injury in the context of open cholecystectomy.
- Negligent bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Avoidable multiple organ failure in negligent hemicolectomy.
- Unnecessary rectopexy for chronic anismus.
General Practice:
- Alleged delayed diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus leading to glaucoma, to acute peripheral neuropathy, and to limb amputation.
- GPs’ failure to follow up on abnormal imaging leading to delayed diagnosis of metastatic breast and skin cancer in the lungs.
- Alleged failures to diagnose atrial fibrillation/refer to cardiology.
Geriatrics:
- Negligent care of elderly high-falls-risk patients and of patients with vascular dementia.
Cosmetic Procedures:
- Allegations of negligent cosmetic procedures involving high-intensity lasers, including laser hair removal and skin treatments.
Dentistry:
- Claims involving negligent root canal therapy and unnecessary extractions.
- Settlement for a child who sustained permanent facial scarring as a result of infection arising from negligent dental treatment.
Obstetrics/midwifery:
- Avoidable stillbirth of a first child, causing physical and significant psychiatric injury to the mother (and affecting future pregnancies).
- Neonatal deaths
- Birth injury cases
- Settlement for a child claimant sustaining injury and permanent scarring due to negligent amniohook usage.